

Should you switch from Apple Watch to Garmin? After using my Apple Watch Series 9 daily for over a year and loving it, I made the jump to the Garmin Forerunner 570 two months ago.

Apple Watch vs Garmin: Why I Switched to Garmin (and DON'T regret it)
Should you switch from Apple Watch to Garmin? After using my Apple Watch Series 9 daily for over a year and loving it, I made the jump to the Garmin Forerunner 570 two months ago. Here's my verdict: for serious athletes, Garmin is SO much better that I don't think I'll ever go back to Apple watches anytime soon.
This isn't about specifications on paper – it's about real-world experience from someone who's put both watches through intensive triathlon training, daily wear, and everything in between.
Winner: Garmin Forerunner 570 (for serious athletes)
Rating: Garmin 4.5/5 | Apple Watch 4/5
Bottom Line: If you're training for endurance events or take fitness seriously, Garmin's superior battery life, physical buttons, and comprehensive training features make it the clear choice. Apple Watch wins for general smartwatch functionality and ecosystem integration.
Best For Athletes: Garmin Forerunner 570
Best For Everyone Else: Apple Watch Series 10
Before diving into the details, there's one specific feature on the Garmin that completely changed how I approach training – something Apple simply can't match. Training Readiness uses heart rate variability, sleep quality, and recent training load to give me a daily score from 1-100 telling me whether my body is ready for intense training or needs recovery.
Right now I have a training readiness score of 82 out of 100, meaning my body is rested enough for tonight's run and swim session. As someone with a habit of overtraining and not taking enough rest days (which leads to injury), this feature acts like a personal coach preventing me from making costly training mistakes.

This is probably the single most noticeable difference between these watches. The Forerunner 570 delivers about 11 days of battery life, while the Apple Watch gives you maybe 1.5–2 days if you're conservative with usage.
Apple Watch Reality: For regular daily use, charging every day didn't bother me much. Just like my iPhone, I developed a habit – put the Apple Watch on its charging stand before my morning shower, and it's charged when I'm done. No big deal for normal activities.
When Apple Watch Battery Becomes Problematic: The battery becomes an issue during longer training sessions. Occasionally on Sundays, I'll do a 7-hour bike ride starting at 4 AM (when traffic isn't bad) followed by a 2-hour run. The Apple Watch battery wouldn't last the whole day. During my recent Ironman 70.3 triathlon, my Apple Watch was at 15% by the end – it wouldn't have lasted much longer. That's problematic because I'm training for a full Ironman next year, and the Apple Watch simply won't last long enough.
Garmin's Always-On Display Trade-off: I experimented with Garmin's Always-On Display because when it's off, I have to wait half a second for the display to react when checking time. With Always-On Display activated, battery life decreases from 11 days to 4 days – still more than double the Apple Watch, but a significant decrease. Because I love the 11-day battery life, I usually keep Always-On Display turned off. The split-second delay is similar to what you get with the Apple Watch anyway.
I didn't realize how big of a deal this would be, but physical buttons are incredibly helpful, especially since I swim frequently. When swimming with the Apple Watch, it's almost impossible to use because water and touchscreens don't work well together. If I want to change settings during a swim session, I have to wipe my wet hand – but when swimming, my whole body is wet, so I find myself trying to dry my fingers on my wet arm, which doesn't work.
Real-World Button Benefits:
The Garmin Forerunner's display is slightly brighter than the Apple Watch. During regular indoor use or cloudy outdoor conditions, both displays are perfectly readable. However, the extra brightness becomes crucial when running during the day in direct sunlight while wearing polarized sunglasses. If you've ever worn polarized sunglasses while looking at a screen, you know what I'm talking about – the Garmin cuts through that combination much better.
The Garmin screen is 42mm compared to the Apple Watch's 41mm – only a 1mm difference on paper, but the Garmin screen feels significantly bigger. It fits more data on the display without feeling cluttered.
Personal preference: I prefer the round display over Apple's squared-off design. There's something classic and timeless about a round watch face that the rectangular design can't replicate.
The Garmin is dramatically more customizable than the Apple Watch, which feels quite limiting once you experience Garmin’s flexibility. With the Garmin watch face, I can choose exactly what metrics I see, change colors, adjust layouts, and add or remove data fields. The level of customization is genuinely impressive.
On my current watch face, I have my Training Readiness metric prominently displayed at the bottom because it’s one of the most important metrics for me. The Apple Watch simply doesn’t offer this level of granular customization for fitness-focused users.
This is where Garmin really shines. The built-in personal trainer provides free daily workout recommendations based on your recovery data. It’s like having a coach who knows exactly how hard you trained yesterday and adjusts today’s workout accordingly. Sometimes it suggests easy recovery runs, sometimes high-intensity intervals, and sometimes complete rest days.
Training Load and Effect: These metrics are particularly valuable.
This helps me understand not just what I did, but what I actually accomplished from a fitness development perspective.

About 30% of my runs are on treadmills (when it’s raining or I’m traveling). Both Apple Watch and Garmin struggle with treadmill accuracy – if I run 10km on the treadmill, both watches might only record 9km.
The crucial difference: Apple Watch offers no way to edit distance and pace after the workout.
With Garmin, I can easily adjust the distance and pace for accurate metrics.
This might seem minor, but I use this feature multiple times per week. It’s important that my pacing and distance are accurate because I use that data to track improvement. When I got the Garmin and could log accurate treadmill times on Strava, my friend messaged saying I’d gotten much faster – when in reality, it was just more accurate data.
During runs, the Garmin display is far easier to read at a glance compared to Apple Watch.
After runs, Apple Watch tells me basic stats:
However, Garmin provides all this PLUS:
There's no question – Garmin is far superior at fitness tracking and acting as a personal trainer on your wrist.
I don’t want to make it sound like Garmin is perfect for everyone. Apple Watch has significant advantages for certain users:
The cellular model is huge for people wanting to leave phones at home during runs. I genuinely miss this feature.
With the cellular Apple Watch, I could do 2-hour runs without my phone and still receive important calls or messages. Garmin requires your phone nearby for any smart features. I never liked running with my chunky iPhone in my pocket, but with Garmin, if I want to stay connected for emergencies, I have to bring my phone.
Apple’s smart home integration is far superior. I could control lights, adjust thermostats, and check security cameras directly from Apple Watch. Garmin has minimal smart home capabilities. If you’re heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem with HomeKit devices, this is a significant downside.
The Apple Watch app ecosystem is more comprehensive. Because Apple’s ecosystem is massive, there are countless third-party apps for almost anything. Garmin’s app selection is limited and focused primarily on fitness and outdoor activities.
One feature I genuinely miss is the fitness circles competition. I used to compete with my business partner on daily calorie burn – winner takes $10. It wasn’t about the money; it was about not being a loser. It was genuinely fun and kept both of us more active. Garmin has social features, but nothing as engaging as Apple’s activity competitions.
For productivity, Apple Watch is slightly better. I could:
The ability to quickly respond to urgent emails during meetings without pulling out my phone was genuinely useful. Garmin focuses almost entirely on health and fitness with far fewer productivity features.
I absolutely love the Apple Solo Loop strap. It’s so comfortable I forget I’m wearing it. It was expensive ($99) and I bought two because the first didn’t fit properly. Then my cat chewed through it, leaving a small nick, but the Solo Loop was totally worth it for comfort.
The Garmin is surprisingly comfortable, but there's one complaint: the wrist strap is thicker than the Solo Loop, so during extended typing sessions, I can feel it pressing against my wrist. Worse, the buckle has made a small scratch on my laptop chassis. This happens with any buckled watch strap, but it's why I prefer the Solo Loop - it's so thin I never notice it.
Ease of Use:
The Solo Loop takes literally 3 seconds to put on - just slide it over your hand. With Garmin, I have to balance the strap on my wrist, count to the 7th hole for proper buckle adjustment, then fiddle to get it on. Small thing, but I notice it daily.
Swimming Considerations:
The Solo Loop soaks up water like a sponge and takes forever to dry after swimming. I don't have this issue with standard Apple silicone straps or Garmin rubber straps - they dry almost immediately.
During Ironman 70.3 training, I often do brick workouts - bike followed immediately by running. With Apple Watch, transitioning between activities meant dealing with the touchscreen while sweaty and trying to switch modes quickly. Sometimes the screen wouldn't respond during transitions. With Garmin, I press a physical button, scroll to the new activity, and press start. Works every single time regardless of conditions.
Multi-Sport Events:
The Garmin can automatically detect transitions from swimming to cycling to running, switching modes accordingly. This is one of the main reasons I switched, since I'm training for triathlons with my next Ironman 70.3 in 4 months. With my recent Ironman, I had to record swim, bike, and run as three separate Apple Watch workouts, which showed up as three different activities on Strava. Garmin records the triathlon as one workout with far more accurate times.

Garmin Forerunner 570 vs Apple Watch Series 10
Winner: Depends on Your Priorities

Winner: Forerunner 970 (if budget allows and if you have big wrists)
The Forerunner 970 offers sapphire glass, built-in flashlight, full GPS mapping, and 15-day battery life for $200 more. However, it's only available in 47mm size. If you need maximum durability and features, and don't mind the larger size, the 970 provides better value in the premium tier.
Saying all of that, I – personally – still prefer the 570, for one reason:
I have small wrists! So the 970 looks like a dinner plate on my wrist. The 570 is the perfect size.
The Garmin Connect app provides incredibly detailed post-workout analysis including power curves, training effect over time, performance condition, and dozens of metrics helping understand fitness trends. You can see countdowns to your next big race and connect with friends who wear Garmin watches.
Apple Health is comprehensive for general health tracking but doesn't provide the same level of athletic performance analysis. I think Apple Health is better for social elements — challenging friends to competitions genuinely made me push training harder as a competitive person.
Neither watch is super durable. They don't use sapphire glass and both have somewhat protruding glass faces prone to scuffs when walking too close to walls. Garmin is probably slightly more durable with its aluminum bezel protecting the glass. For maximum durability, consider the Garmin Forerunner 970 or Apple Watch Ultra, both featuring scratch-resistant sapphire glass.
Both watches track sleep adequately, breaking down sleep into light, deep, and REM stages, tracking consistency, and providing sleep scores factoring into overall recovery metrics.
What I find most valuable is how Garmin connects sleep quality to training readiness. If I have a poor night's sleep, my training readiness score reflects that, and the watch adjusts workout recommendations accordingly. This integrated approach to recovery tracking helps me make better decisions about when to train hard and when to prioritize rest.
Apple Watch sleep tracking is solid for basic metrics like total sleep time and consistency, but doesn't provide the same level of insight into how sleep affects fitness and training capacity.
Q: Which watch is better for serious athletes?
A: Garmin Forerunner 570 wins decisively for serious athletes. The 11-day battery life, physical buttons, comprehensive training features, and detailed analysis make it superior for endurance training and multisport activities.
Q: Which watch is better for everyday smartwatch use?
A: Apple Watch Series 10 is better for general smartwatch functionality. The app ecosystem, smart home integration, cellular connectivity, and seamless iOS integration provide a more comprehensive smart device experience.
Q: Can I get cellular connectivity with Garmin watches?
A: No, Garmin watches require your phone nearby for smart features. This is one of Apple Watch's biggest advantages — the cellular model allows completely phone-free workouts while staying connected.
.jpg)
Q: How accurate is the 11-day Garmin battery life claim?
A: Very accurate in real-world testing. With normal use and always-on display disabled, I consistently get 10–11 days. With always-on display enabled, it drops to 3–4 days, still significantly better than Apple Watch's 1.5–2 days.
Q: Does the Apple Watch really only last 1–2 days?
A: Yes, in my experience with Series 9. With normal use including workouts, notifications, and apps, I need to charge it daily. During long endurance activities, it can die within 8–10 hours of continuous GPS tracking.
Q: How do physical buttons compare to touchscreen in real use?
A: Physical buttons are dramatically better for athletic activities. Touchscreens become nearly unusable when wet, sweaty, or wearing gloves. Physical buttons work reliably in any condition, which is crucial during swimming, cycling, or running in challenging weather.
Q: What is training readiness and why does it matter?
A: Training readiness analyzes heart rate variability, sleep quality, and recent training load to provide a daily score (1–100) indicating whether your body is ready for intense training or needs recovery. It's like having a personal coach preventing overtraining and optimizing performance.
Q: Can I edit workout data on Apple Watch?
A: No, Apple Watch doesn't allow post-workout editing of distance, pace, or other metrics. This is problematic for treadmill workouts where GPS accuracy is poor. Garmin allows easy editing for accurate training logs.
Q: Which watch is better for swimming?
A: Garmin Forerunner 570 is significantly better for swimming due to physical buttons that work underwater. Apple Watch touchscreen becomes nearly impossible to use when wet, making it difficult to change settings or pause workouts during swim sessions.
Q: Which watch is more comfortable for all-day wear?
A: Apple Watch with Solo Loop is more comfortable for daily wear and typing. Garmin's buckle strap can press against your wrist during extended keyboard use and may scratch laptop surfaces. However, Garmin is more comfortable for athletic activities.
Q: Why do you prefer round vs rectangular watch faces?
A: Personal preference, but round faces feel more traditional and timeless. The Garmin's round display also fits more data without feeling cluttered, while Apple's rectangular design feels more like wearing a small computer.
Q: How visible are the screens in bright sunlight?
A: Garmin is noticeably better in direct sunlight, especially when wearing polarized sunglasses. Both are fine for normal outdoor use, but Garmin cuts through the combination of bright light and polarized lenses much better.
Q: Does Garmin work well with iPhone?
A: Yes, Garmin works fine with iPhone through the Garmin Connect app. However, integration isn't as seamless as Apple Watch with iOS. You lose some convenience features like responding to messages directly from the watch.
Q: Can I use Garmin without an iPhone?
A: For basic fitness tracking, yes. But smart features like notifications, music control, and data syncing require a connected smartphone. Unlike Apple Watch cellular models, Garmin watches don't have independent connectivity.
Q: Which ecosystem is better long-term?
A: Depends on your priorities. Apple ecosystem is better for overall smart device integration and convenience. Garmin ecosystem is better for serious athletic training and performance analysis.
.png)
After two months with the Garmin Forerunner 570 following over a year with Apple Watch Series 9, I'm completely convinced that Garmin is the superior choice for serious athletes. The 11-day battery life alone transforms the user experience — no more charging anxiety, no more missed training data due to dead batteries during long workouts.
The physical buttons work flawlessly in conditions where Apple Watch's touchscreen fails. Swimming, cycling with gloves, running in rain — Garmin just works reliably every time. The training readiness feature has genuinely changed how I approach workouts, preventing overtraining and optimizing performance in ways Apple simply can't match.
However, Apple Watch remains the better overall smartwatch. The app ecosystem, smart home integration, cellular connectivity, and seamless iOS integration provide a more comprehensive smart device experience. For casual fitness enthusiasts who want a great smartwatch that happens to track workouts, Apple Watch is still the better choice.
Choose Garmin if:
Choose Apple Watch if:
As someone training for Ironman triathlons, the Garmin Forerunner 570 has become an indispensable training partner. The training insights, battery reliability, and weather-proof operation justify every penny. I genuinely don't think I'll go back to Apple Watch anytime soon.
But I'm honest enough to admit that for most people who aren't serious endurance athletes, Apple Watch Series 10 is probably the smarter choice. It's a better general-purpose device that happens to track fitness well, rather than a specialized athletic tool that happens to have some smart features.
Both are excellent watches serving different priorities. Choose based on whether you're primarily an athlete who needs smart features, or a smartphone user who wants better fitness tracking.
